I write.
writ·ing
/ˈrītiNG/
Noun
| |
Synonyms
|
Writing, more particularly, refers to two things: writing as, or is, the thing that is written; and writing as a gerund, which designates the activity of writing. It refers to the inscription of characters on a medium, thereby forming words, and larger units of language, known as texts. It also refers to the creation of meaning and the information thereby generated. In that regard, linguistics (and related sciences) distinguishes between the written language and the spoken language.
The significance of the medium by which meaning and information is
conveyed is indicated by the distinction made in the arts and sciences.
For example, while public speaking and poetry reading are both types of speech, the former is governed by the rules of rhetoric and the latter by poetics.
A person who composes a story or message in the form of text is generally known as a writer or an author. However, more specific designations exist which are dictated by the particular nature of the text such as that of poet, essayist, novelist, playwright, journalist, and more. A translator
is a specialized multilingual writer who must fully understand a
message written by somebody else in one language; the translator's job
is to produce a document of faithfully equivalent message in a
completely different language. A person who transcribes or produces text to deliver a message authored by another person is known as a scribe, typist or typesetter. A person who produces text with emphasis on the aesthetics of glyphs is known as a calligrapher or graphic designer.
Writing is also a distinctly human activity. Such writing has been speculatively designated as coincidental. At this point in time, the only confirmed writing in existence is of human origin.
Means for recording information
H.G. Wells
argued that writing has the ability to "put agreements, laws,
commandments on record. It made the growth of states larger than the old
city states possible. It made a continuous historical consciousness
possible. The command of the priest or king and his seal could go far
beyond his sight and voice and could survive his death".[3]
Although how writing fosters critical thinking is not clear
(Applebee), theoreticians and practitioners alike agree that writing
promotes both critical thinking and learning (See Adams, Britton,
Bruner, Emig, Herrington, Knoblauch and Brannon, Odell, Parker on the
linked bibliography.) As Toby Fulwiler and Art Young explain in their
"Introduction" to Language Connections: Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum:
Writing to communicate--or what James Britton calls "transactional writing"--means writing to accomplish something, to inform, instruct, or persuade. . . . Writing to learn is different. We write to ourselves as well as talk with others to objectify our perceptions of reality; the primary function of this "expressive" language is not to communicate, but to order and represent experience to our own understanding. In this sense language provides us with a unique way of knowing and becomes a tool for discovering, for shaping meaning, and for reaching understanding. (p. x)
In "Writing to Learn Means Learning to Think," Syrene Forsman makes
the same point, but she directs her attention not to a theoretical
justification but a practical rationale for writing to learn:
As teachers we can choose between (a) sentencing students to thoughtless mechanical operations and (b) facilitating their ability to think. If students' readiness for more involved thought processes is bypassed in favor of jamming more facts and figures into their heads, they will stagnate at the lower levels of thinking. But if students are encouraged to try a variety of thought processes in classes, they can, regardless of their ages, develop considerable mental power. Writing is one of the most effective ways to develop thinking. (p. 162)

No comments:
Post a Comment
I am now moderating comments.